JESUS IS ARRESTED
Matthew 26:57-68
The initial arrest of the Lord was not by Roman authorities. He had broken no civil laws. Rather, this was a religious action perpetrated by the High Priest, Caiaphas, and his henchmen, the chief priests and elders.
A careful study of Jesus' opposition during His ministry will reveal that His main source of antagonism and trouble was religious people. Likewise, most of the trouble Christians have in their life is prompted or instigated by religious personalities. This may be a mutual friend, a fellow church goer, a denominational zealot, a cult member, or any other "religious" faction. It is almost always an act of revenge or even hatred. Sometimes, the greatest enemy a Christian has is the person (people) who are around them almost all the time. We need to understand that the devil will use us in this way unless we guard against being his disciple.
In their zeal to destroy Jesus, they violated their own Jewish law by conducting a trial at night. Adding to their illegal action, they put out the word that they needed witnesses to validate this arrest. In fact, the Bible states that they sought false witnesses. After interviewing many false witnesses (whose testimonies apparently were not significant) they finally found two men whose "testimony" could be used.
When a group of people are determined to cause significant damage to someone the illegal aspect of their action is conveniently ignored. Even in our times, the Biblical rules for discipline in church disputes are mostly set aside. In addition, civil trials are often a travesty because of the bad actions of some police officers, trial attorneys, judges, and juries. Many people have been irreversibly hurt (health damaged, bank accounts depleted, reputations destroyed) by false witnesses who were willing (coerced/paid) to lie under oath. This example in the Lord's life ought to help us understand that "false witnesses" can always be found who are willing to commit perjury in order to assist in an illegal action.
The false witnesses' testimony was a distortion of the teaching of Jesus concerning His resurrection. Seizing upon this supposed violation of the Jewish law, Caiaphas,
demanded of Jesus ("under oath by the living God") to state if He is the Christ, the Son of God.
Of course, Jesus did not say that He would destroy the Temple and rebuild it in three days. (see John 2:13-22) His comments were aimed at His eventual crucifixion and subsequent resurrection. However, this false testimony gave the High Priest the ammunition he needed to ferociously attack Jesus with a question which he knew would cause a provocative answer. He set the stage for the charge of blasphemy. He really did not care at all about the Temple statement. In fact, I believe the High Priest knew exactly what Jesus meant and chose to repudiate Christ and reject Him for who He is. I think his question reveals the depth of his understanding. This same technique (using a none issue to set up a serious charge) is often used against Christians today. The infamous "right-wing conspiracy" charge, for instance. Usually, charges leveled against Christians are almost always preceded by cleverly disguised "hot-button" comments.
Jesus' answer seemingly enraged the High Priest. He tore his clothes (in a feigned expression of outrage and grief) and shouted that the Lord's own blasphemous words were enough to convict Him. His appeal to the assembled anti-Christ crowd drew the expected response, "He is deserving of death."
There was no way the Lord could avoid this scene. He certainly was not going to lie in order to escape the mob. And, it was evident that they were not searching for the truth. He spoke of His future, when He will authoritatively return in the clouds of heaven, and of His place at the right hand of Power. The truth did not matter. We need to understand that when the enemy attacks us, using people as his pawns, he will not be dissuaded by the truth. He only seeks to destroy. Right, though temporarily wronged, will win in the end!
Having tried, convicted, and sentenced Jesus in this ridiculous and illegal farce of a trial, the crowd than sat out to mock and humiliate Jesus by spitting in His face,
beating Him, striking Him with their hand while demanding a prophetic response from Him.
Remember, this "trial" was not a civil trial. This was a religious "trial" prompted by the religious authorities who hated and despised the Lord. However, it was a necessary action in order to set the stage for the future events. The Roman government had taken away the power of the Jews to enact a death sentence so this staging was crucial. Of course, it would not be His remarks concerning the Temple or His claim to Deity which would influence Pilate. He had no concern at all about religious matters.
We must understand that the actions of unbelievers will always be cruel and hateful when they are seeking to discredit a Christian. The very nature of their actions require that they demean, disgrace and dishonor the individual. For this reason, when people learn that a convicted person is a Christian the level of humiliation intensifies.
We must learn from Jesus to speak the truth regardless of the cost.